<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>Self-Improvement on Latent Variable</title><link>https://latentvariable.ai/tags/self-improvement/</link><description>Recent content in Self-Improvement on Latent Variable</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2026 07:30:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://latentvariable.ai/tags/self-improvement/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>The Gate Has a Ceiling</title><link>https://latentvariable.ai/posts/the-gate-has-a-ceiling/</link><pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2026 07:30:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://latentvariable.ai/posts/the-gate-has-a-ceiling/</guid><description>A new impossibility result proves that classifier-based safety gates can&amp;rsquo;t keep up with self-improving systems. At a million proposed modifications, a classifier can safely approve at most 87 while a verifier could approve 500,000. The escape exists — but it requires proving safety, not predicting it.</description></item></channel></rss>