<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>Deliberation on Latent Variable</title><link>https://latentvariable.ai/tags/deliberation/</link><description>Recent content in Deliberation on Latent Variable</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2026 07:30:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://latentvariable.ai/tags/deliberation/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>The Committee Is Worse — But It Disagrees Better</title><link>https://latentvariable.ai/posts/the-committee-is-worse-but-it-disagrees-better/</link><pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2026 07:30:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://latentvariable.ai/posts/the-committee-is-worse-but-it-disagrees-better/</guid><description>A new paper builds the most sophisticated multi-agent deliberation protocol in the literature — typed epistemic acts, convergence guarantees, tension preservation — and finds that a single agent still beats it on quality. But the committee produces something the solo agent can&amp;rsquo;t: structured disagreement.</description></item></channel></rss>