<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>Benchmarks on Latent Variable</title><link>https://latentvariable.ai/tags/benchmarks/</link><description>Recent content in Benchmarks on Latent Variable</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://latentvariable.ai/tags/benchmarks/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Your Agent Passed the Test by Breaking Every Rule</title><link>https://latentvariable.ai/posts/your-agent-passed-the-test-by-breaking-every-rule/</link><pubDate>Sat, 14 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://latentvariable.ai/posts/your-agent-passed-the-test-by-breaking-every-rule/</guid><description>A new paper introduces &amp;lsquo;Procedure-Aware Evaluation&amp;rsquo; and reveals that 27–78% of benchmark successes conceal procedural violations. No model achieves more than 24% reliable compliance. The implications for anyone deploying agents are significant.</description></item></channel></rss>